Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

1 million active physicians in the US. At $352k/ year that is only $352 billion in physician compensation, or less than 10% of total healthcare spending.

> That’s a big chunk of the difference.

The math disagrees with you.




You have to add in nurses, techs, administrative staff, etc... It could easily be 40% to 50% of total spending, so the parents point seems valid.


What does that have to do with physician salaries?


The differential compared to France for most other jobs in the healthcare sector is similar to the differential for physician salaries?


That’s not what OP was saying. They were saying that physician salaries are a big part of the difference, which they are not.


10% is a big chunk.

Are you confused as to the meaning of 'big chunk'?

It by no means implies a majority or even close to a majority.

If you are confused about my previous comment, I added the 40% to 50% example to demonstrate the likely overall contribution of salaries to costs.


No one has ever seen "big chunk" and thought 10%


'No one'... according to yourself?

This appears to be a random pseudonym account so it's unproductive to phrase it in this way, because it requires a lot more credibility to back it up.

A simple counterexample: I clearly think 10% is fine, and I've met at least a few dozen people who share a similar view. Which suggests it's a common enough sentiment among HN readers.


https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/larg...

I've met at least a few dozen people who share a similar view. Which suggests it's a common enough sentiment among HN readers.

Like who?


If the link has something to add to your argument, can you quote the specific section?

It appears to reinforce my point, in that it never defines 'large chunk' to have any specific range of values. Certainly not anywhere near a majority.

> Like who?

Some of the human individuals I've met and talked with throughout life.


All of the human individuals I've met and talked with throughout life think both "BIG CHUNK" and "LARGE CHUNK" mean more than 10%.


> All of the human individuals I've met and talked with throughout life think both "BIG CHUNK" and "LARGE CHUNK" mean more than 10%.

This seems like ignoring the question, so the opinion is noted, but it doesn't sound convincing.

I still stand by my belief.


I still stand by my belief even harder.


Please don't get into tit for tat spats like this. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


Sure.


Please don't get into tit for tat spats like this. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


Never seen somebody so aggressively wrong. Just take the L and move on, my dude. Surely you have better things to do than to try to boost your ego by “winning” internet arguments through sheer volume of responses.


There's almost no difference after 'winning' or 'losing', other than extra word count on HN. So if this bothers you so much, asking me seems pointless. Maybe try asking yourself?


You’re the one going in circles chasing your tail. Maybe try asking yourself what you’re doing with your life.


If this is indeed 'going in circles chasing your tail', then why do your opinions in this comment chain matter at all?


You couldn’t resist the temptation to reply, could you? Go outside and touch some grass.


> If this is indeed 'going in circles chasing your tail', then why do your opinions in this comment chain matter at all?

Is there some rationale behind the seemingly incredible agitation, and bizarre attempts at deflecting direct questions?

Otherwise this just seems like a self-parody.


That’s quite rich coming from you.


> If this is indeed 'going in circles chasing your tail', then why do your opinions in this comment chain matter at all?


Please don't post flamewar comments like you repeatedly did in this thread. We eventually have to ban accounts that do that.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.


[flagged]


You broke the site guidelines extremely badly and repeatedly in this thread—far worse than the other commenter. And it unfortunately looks like you've been posting unsubstantive comments and/or aggressive comments (e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37737463) in other places too.

If you keep doing this, we're going to have to ban you again. I don't want to do that, so if you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: