Saying "No child genital mutilation" draws cheers in some places now, until you add "including circumcision of male babies," when it somehow becomes a "freedom of faith question" where some faiths are incorrect and some aint.
With previous practices in mind, perhaps we could advocate against all child mutilation of any form? If a person's body is developed in way that does not interfere with their function; let them reach the age of majority before helping them carve on themselves?
We need the Pastafarians to start tattooing a drawing of a fusili on the left butcheek of their 1-old-newborns or something. Maybe that will force the freedom-of-faith crowd to take pause and think a little.
Saying "No child genital mutilation" draws cheers in some places now, until you add "including circumcision of male babies," when it somehow becomes a "freedom of faith question" where some faiths are incorrect and some aint.
With previous practices in mind, perhaps we could advocate against all child mutilation of any form? If a person's body is developed in way that does not interfere with their function; let them reach the age of majority before helping them carve on themselves?