Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is 2d monopoles on the 2d surface of a material.

This is equivalent to propping up a horseshoe magnet with the ends up, and laying a piece of paper across it; that also gives you a 2d surface with a pair of monopoles on it.

It's still interesting and probably useful for building things, but it's not "we broke a known law of physics".




Your analogy would imply that the other pole exists, it's just someplace else.

Is that what the paper is suggesting? I didn't see that, but admittedly most of it went over my head.


I don't think the paper cares, since it's about how the fields on the surface behave locally while the other pole needing to exist (and of course it could be split into multiple weaker ones, or smeared out, or whatever) is an invariant that applies to the object as a whole.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: