Yea, during the dark ages of toxic Wikipedia editors, I had ample of citations to split apart "Deaf" (ethnocentric label) from "Deafness" (culture) and "Hearing-Loss" (medical) not to mention the toxic ableism of "Hearing Impaired" (former medical), it was nothing but a browbeating, deletion of my Wiki drafts, and reversion of my hard and diligent efforts.
About 20 years later, some 240 Deaf wikipedia editors finally led a revolt: first to fall is "hearing impaired" (ablist slang), of which many governments/civic/businesses are now moving away from.
About 20 years later, some 240 Deaf wikipedia editors finally led a revolt: first to fall is "hearing impaired" (ablist slang), of which many governments/civic/businesses are now moving away from.
We are almost there.