There's also "more to the story" where the plaintiff appears to have been on the board of the foreign company as well. This almost seems like a case where they are trying to take an extremely complex nuanced tax case, strip away all the "color", and try that component.
This over being taxed on $15K, tells me there are some bigger players in this case vs some farmer who wanted to take this case to the supreme court over "principle"
This over being taxed on $15K, tells me there are some bigger players in this case vs some farmer who wanted to take this case to the supreme court over "principle"