Taking the title completely literally, I still find with modern AI and expensive phone cameras that it's still difficult to accurately capture colour as we experience it.
I tried to share a picture of some fabric samples get an opinion from someone. From the display, most of the samples looked correct except one - a deep turqoise that the camera would refuse to capture no matter what exposure or white balance I chose.
I remember browsing through a pantone book (I think) and how all the colours would react to the tiniest change to ambient light, something you'd need a spectrometer to properly capture. Displays and cameras have been getting higher and higher resolutions, but the fedility in which we can capture and display colour doesn't seem to have improved in the last 10 years.
I tried to share a picture of some fabric samples get an opinion from someone. From the display, most of the samples looked correct except one - a deep turqoise that the camera would refuse to capture no matter what exposure or white balance I chose.
I remember browsing through a pantone book (I think) and how all the colours would react to the tiniest change to ambient light, something you'd need a spectrometer to properly capture. Displays and cameras have been getting higher and higher resolutions, but the fedility in which we can capture and display colour doesn't seem to have improved in the last 10 years.