Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> The problem comes in when you repeat the exercise on a different example and find that also 0/0 = 3, or whatever. And now you start to see something is really amiss.

Yes, that's the obvious part.




That really sounds like it would be the identity.

If dividing by nothing is congruent with no operation, then the original set, unmodified should be returned.


In this case, but the induction step is still important...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: