With all due respect, this is just the original article re-hosted, which I was under the impression we were advised against submitting as the canonical link. I really dislike MSN links like this because they make it very difficult to find that actual original URL without going back out to a search engine, and the page is cluttered with advertisement and pushes for Microsoft services. The only indication this was published by WSJ is a badge next to the headline and once you scroll the headline out of view there is no other indication this is published by WSJ and not Microsoft. Arguably sites like archive.ph do a better job of showing attribution than MSN does.
