Until there's actual general AI, we'll still need people that understand how things work on a fundamental level. You can use AI created code, but you still need someone to tie everything together. You're also going to want an experienced person to debug when something goes wrong.
I think it's funny how terrified people are at the prospect of AI and machines doing most of the work for human beings. If used intelligently and equitably, it'll mean more free time and prosperity for everyone.
The first point seems to be generally accepted, though the second about "prosperity for everyone" presupposes some very drastic social changes. Automation tends to make a portion of people more prosperous at the cost of displacing some other portion. In order to realize prosperity for everyone, there must be minimal displacement and likely a robust social safety net to enable the displaced to recover and attain prosperity at some later time.
I think it's funny how terrified people are at the prospect of AI and machines doing most of the work for human beings. If used intelligently and equitably, it'll mean more free time and prosperity for everyone.