>The union is so far providing some details of the agreement, more of which will likely emerge in the next few days
so it's not in the article because they haven't allowed those details to be public yet. dare i say, that's ominous to announce "we agree" but to keep the terms secret till it's inked, but we'll see i guess
>The union is so far providing some details of the agreement, more of which will likely emerge in the next few days
so it's not in the article because they haven't allowed those details to be public yet. dare i say, that's ominous to announce "we agree" but to keep the terms secret till it's inked, but we'll see i guess