Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The first thing that came to my mind after reading, “… makes a lot sense” was the latency overhead that’s incurred when RA is activated and associating it with drunk driving due to the increased response time.

Maybe the article answers the following, but don’t know since I haven’t read it yet.

- median, p95, p99 latencies for remote assistance

- max speed vehicle can go when RA is activated.




I think a lot of the confusion here is over what's meant by "RA". This isn't a remote driving situation. It's like Waymo, where the human can make suggestions that give the robot additional information about the environment.


Exactly. Not all remote assists need a low-latency connection.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: