I attempted the Uberman sleep cycle about a year ago. I managed to get by with 20 minutes sleep every 4 hours. I lasted 2 weeks before bad things started happening (hallucinating, extreme weakness, and major cognitive deterioration). It was a fun experience but something I am convinced is fabricated and doesn't work despite some peoples anecdotal evidence.
That was my experience as well when I tried it 10 years ago.
I started with Uberman, but had to shift to a schedule with 4 hours of core sleep towards the end of the second week, as I was getting severely sleep deprived and unable to function. I'd gone close to four days without sleep a few years prior, and the feeling was pretty much the same.
My interest was sparked as I've always had trouble with my circadian cycle, and my free running sleep eventually evolved to a polyphasic rythm to keep up with work, study and social life. I eventually had to give that up, as I ended up having extremely vivid dreams that were hard to discern from reality.
Getting a good nights sleep and possibly an afternoon nap really is the key.
It's hard for me to say anything on this topic without resorting to hyperbole. I have a serious sleep disorder and in desperation, I tried a polyphasic experiment about 7 years ago.
I was determined to see it through no matter what the cost. The conclusion I came to was that it is a complete scam, perpetrated on life-hackers who are often, productivity hounds. Polyphasic sleep does not work; it does not improve productivity; it is not healthy. The only people who have slept like this on a consistent basis are soldiers or other people in extreme situations, where wakefulness is equivalent to survival and so the damage to your mind is a trade-off. If you are not fighting to stay alive, then you gain nothing by not following your body's natural rhythms, and you can seriously mess yourself up by experimenting with alternatives.
Then again, you're young so you'll probably recover. Probably.
I know a developer who tried polyphasic sleep. He said it worked as far as productivity goes, but his unwelcome side effect was that he would get sick very easily.
I had a biphasic schedule about 8 years ago for 9 months. I slept at night from 1:30am to 6:00am and in the afternoon from 3:00pm to 4:30pm. I was never tired. I felt like I had two days in one. It was great. I worked from 7am - 2pm, ate lunch, and went back to sleep. When I woke up at 4:30pm, I had 9 hours of free time until I would sleep next.
I don't have a flexible work schedule like that anymore, and now that I live in San Francisco, the environment is not exactly quiet enough at 3pm for quality sleep.
I recommend trying it out if you have the flexibility. Avoid caffeine. Treat the afternoon sleep time, the same as you would the night time. Block out noise and light. Be consistent. Having two days in one is pretty awesome.
I experimented with this though college. I found the idea that you could have extra months in your year amazing. But I could never stick with it for more than a couple days at a time. It was primarily this that kept kicking me off:
"I also have a theory about just being conscience that long, you start to lose a sense of time there is no finality just this never ending loop of waking up and sleeping"
I really decided I needed significant time sleeping to reset my brain. Otherwise it did just feel like a single extended consciousness.
And if you believe John Medina in Brain Rules (http://www.brainrules.net/) sleep is what solidifies memory. Which missing that isn't so helpful to a college student.
I never tried any unusual sleep schedule, but I have worked third shift while trying to keep a social life.
It does get hard, even on a third shift schedule that millions of normal people deal with, to tell the days apart. When the day switches in the middle of your work shift, when it's light out all "night", even a normal third shift schedule makes the days run together. I did it for a year, and not a single day went by when it didn't feel like I took a short nap through the day then worked the rest of the time. Even when I got 8 hours of sleep.
I started drinking. I started smoking. I got short with my friends. I had to quit, because when there are no "days", life became meaningless to me. It was just one long night that lasted for a year. Things that happened ten minutes ago went into my memory as happening yesterday. When I quit my job and went back to sleeping normal, I stopped my self destructive habits literally overnight.
Millions of normal healthy people do it every day. But beware of forcing yourself into sleep schedules that you are not mentally prepared to handle. Know when to throw in the towel.
My sleep schedule naturally is all over the board, that is just the way my body is designed, I can't help it, and I have found my days running together in some sort of glob, like there is nothing in between.
To me it is a weird sensation, but being a work-aholic I hardly noticed it till I started being off by a day or two and my boss caught me on it. I started making sure to take the weekends off and it has slowly corrected itself, now I take the weekends off and do what I want to do not work and it is absolutely fantastic.
I'm the dad of a five-week old and, give or take a little, this seems pretty much the pattern I had for weeks 0-3. The thing I found most surprising was how I did manage to function after waking, and in a relatively short space of time after waking. The second most surprising thing was how hellish, for me, it felt to be waking after the naps.
Edit: Since about week 4, I've tried to pack more 'regular' sleep in.
That's something I remember about having an infant, how the experience of waking up was literally painful. Sometimes, I would stay up later than was wise, just because I was dreading the experience of dawn. Obviously, that's not a smart strategy.
Don't get me wrong, I've tried it, and failed like many others before me. I'd tried the uberman method for about 2 weeks before falling, and I didn't feel very productive during that time at all (although there were times that I felt more awake than I ever have done, and time seemed to merge, days didn't exist... it's a weird feeling)
I've now adapted the old version of polyphasic sleep, take a nap in the afternoon and sleep for about 6 hours on a night and it seems to be doing me well :)
But! I am tempted to give the uberman method another try, and I will write about it if anyone would be interested?
tl;dr version:
- the first 5-7 days are just awful but after that you're not tired
- deviating from the schedule (say, staying awake 7 hours one time instead of 4) is devastating
- you do feel different and perceive time differently. Kind of like San Diego weather instead of Boston.
Interesting experience, worth a try, I'd do it again in a heartbeat if my home and work schedule accommodated it.
I wouldn't even try something like this, so good on you for giving it a shot and writing about it.
However, having researched polyphasic sleep before, my reaction at coming to the end of your essay was surprise that you'd ended the experiment prematurely. It seemed like you hadn't given yourself time to fully adjust. I expected a Week 3 during which you were able to drop immediately into REM and wake up refreshed.
I assume you just ran out of vacation, which is understandable. But it seems unfair to judge polyphasic sleep based on an incomplete run.
That maybe the case; I am not sure; albiet by that point I quickly realized other affects that would be make the sleeping routine, undesirable. The sleeping may have been better in Week 3, but I did run out of vacation. :)
I read this some years ago.. I've since then become very skeptical about his story.
The guy makes money off of his blog, he's basically the internet version of a life coach. Writing "inspirational" articles on how to improve your life, with almost nothing to back them up.
There's plenty incentive for him to have fabricated this. And back when I was interested in the uberman sleep schedule, he was the only person on the internet I could find who claimed he had done it for more than a couple of weeks
I'm not debating your position on whether or not Steve did the polyphasic sleep, but none of those links don't really have much actual evidence of him being(or specifically call him) a liar or a charlatan.
Actually, Steve continued to maintain his polyphasic sleep schedule for a total of 5.5 months, not 90 days [1]. It appears that he simply did not update his sleep log entries very frequently after day 90.
Is there any actual evidence that anyone has ever been able to stick to one of these polyphasic sleeping schedules for a long period of time? All I ever hear about it is vague unsubstantiated claims about how a bunch of really smart people did it their entire lives and stories about how people tried it for a week or two and then stopped.
I work for international teams with no one I work with being on my timezone, I work from home.
So every day my sleep schedule is different. My wake schedule is different. I should record my schedule since it's difficult to remember since it changes every day.
To give some impression, yesterday I had meetings at 2am, 6am, 6pm, and 10pm. Through that I slept, and had social time. I ate and had normal experiences.
They just weren't on any sort of real schedule. Tired? I sleep. Awake? I go do things or work.
Anyone else do this sort thing? So far I don't ever feel "wrong" about the schedule physically, because it's always changing. Now constant change feels right.
Sleep all night tonight? Sure. Wake up at 2am and work till 10 am this night? Sure. Have a meeting a 3am, then sleep till 6am, then work some more? Sure.
I just follow whatever seems like the most reasonably course of action. Including work 10 hours today, and 6 hours the next. Whatever makes sense.
There was a while in college I was like that. It's like you confuse your circadian rhythm enough that it stops bothering you. It was super convenient, but once you sleep the several days in the row it starts breaking down. You just need to constantly be changing it up a bit.
My experience is the same. If I constantly change it up, I have no problems.
On weekends I try to hold to a more timezone specific schedule, but include odd naps at odd times to sort of keep the schedule of broken sleep.
One other aspect I've noticed is I used to feel more tired and people would always comment on how tired I looked. Now I feel much more awake and in the moment, although honestly I have no idea why this would matter.
I think I'm always kept at a constant state of having slept not all that long ago, even if it was a short period of time, and that helps? This is guessing.
The other aspect is, I try to keep my sleep intervals at an hour 30. so, 1:30, 3, 4:30 hours. Not sure if that has anything to do with it, but easier for me to wake up when I do that.
I've gotten locked into strange sleep cycles simply out of necessity (I am an undergraduate student at Carnegie Mellon). I've found that, while my body will accept a psuedo-equilibrium of somehow getting ~ 20 hours of sleep a week, it will almost always become unsustainable after 2 weeks... in which I'll need another day or two to recover. But after that (usually I take an entire week off, where I get at least 30 hours of sleep) I go back into my regular routine (note that I have a 105 minute sleep cycle, which is a little longer than most people's:
I'm curious: how did you figure out your sleep cycle that precisely (105 minutes)? I have been feeling like 90 minutes is not exactly right for me, but I haven't figured out a way to measure my sleep cycle.
It seemed like all the other articles were super positive about it. This one seems more in line with my own experiences. I've settled on a biphasic sleep (5-6 hours + 30-40 nap midday) but only when I can. If I have too much trouble waking up or if I can't take a day nap I sleep like a normal person.
I tried what might be called polyphasic sleeping twice. When both of my kids were born. It sucked. Babies do it, and their parents are forced to join them for the first few months of life. It's a damned good thing we teach kids the normal way of sleeping, when it's night.
The BBC published an interesting article recently about how it was possibly customary until fairly recently to sleep in two sessions at night, with an hour or two of wakefulness in between them. People would get up, read, eat, talk with their partners etc. in the wakeful hours.
TBH, I'm not sure the evidence is convincing, but it'd an interesting concept.
Well, I'm not sure that's a very good idea. Apart from the fact that sleep helps solidify facts learned during the day (not sure whether this is really true or not but from my experience I'd say there is something to it) I remember reading a paper claiming sleep could have a crucial function in cell refreshing and rest even on a molecular basis. In fact, the former physiological and psychiological effect could be very well implicated by the latter one actually.
"I found myself constantly switching between reading, coding or the next shiny thing finding it hard to focus on any given one."
This is a symptom of ADD, however it is caused by lack of sleep. I experience this, so I'm very familiar with it. I've tried CPAP, oral sleep appliances, and everything else. Nothing has worked perfectly.
The sailors that cross oceans single-handed use some variant of this. The reports I've read is that the first two days are quite hard to handle but once in the quite issolated routine it works for certain folks.
Eventually I ran into this blog and when I read it I immediately quit the cycle http://www.supermemo.com/articles/polyphasic.htm
If anyone has any questions about it/are thinking of trying a sleep cycle I would be glad to answer!