On: Why many scientists are now saying climate change ...

[NegativeLatency]

That does not look like the most journalistically rigorous site the mentioned article is from "Energy Talking Points", I suspect it's a shill for the "energy" (read fossil fuel) industry, based on a random selection of their other article titles:

- How today's global anti-fossil-fuel agenda is crippling American small businesses

- An open letter to Elizabeth Warren on natural gas prices

- Talking Points on the dangerous falsehood that "Climate change is a public health issue"

I'm open to examining the science, but I don't appreciate equating the views of an industry insider or someone with an axe to grind with what a much more broad consensus of scientists have to say about climate change.

Especially when there's a _very_ clear financial incentive for the "energy" industry to continue business as usual. Qui bono?

[it → NegativeLatency]

You can ask "qui bono?" about people who believe the Climate Change narrative as well. For example, here's $5 billion allocated to this sort of thing:

https://www.epa.gov/inflation-reduction-act/climate-pollutio....

[anonymouskimmer → it]

Those grants appear to be for implementation, not research or white papers.

[it → it]

Another cowardly downvote by someone without an argument.