Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Robert Roberson Is on Texas Death Row for a Crime That Never Occurred (innocenceproject.org)
13 points by rossant 7 months ago | hide | past | favorite | 8 comments



I don't understand how anyone could be in favor of the death penalty.

Forget about the fact that sometimes innocent people get executed. Forget about how expensive it is to execute someone. Forget about the idea that the state shouldn't have the power to kill its own citizens.

Even forgetting all of that, I still can't see why you'd want to execute someone.

Is it that people want justice? Revenge? (What's the difference, here?) If so, fine. Is killing somebody really justice? Would it not be more just for someone to rot in a cage for all their years, instead of receiving the mercy of death? You can't teach a lesson to a dead man.

What's the point?


Sometimes, even if someone is sentenced to life in prison they are let out and kill again.

Also, putting remorseless killers in prison also represents a threat to other prisoners. We haven't figured out how to prevent that yet.

Should capital punishment be more strictly controlled with a massively high barrier to use, yes, but there are solid reasons to use it.


> Sometimes, even if someone is sentenced to life in prison they are let out and kill again.

Life without parole exists

> Also, putting remorseless killers in prison also represents a threat to other prisoners. We haven't figured out how to prevent that yet.

Solitary confinement exists

> Should capital punishment be more strictly controlled with a massively high barrier to use, yes, but there are solid reasons to use it.

What are the solid reasons to kill somebody in prison ?


Solitary confinement is a torture, and should never be used, even for the most reprehensible of people. You may mean that they be physically sequestered from other people if they're dangerous, which death row inmates often are, but no human deserves to be isolated from others for anything more than a short period.


some crime statutes include "without parole" as a sentencing guideline. The legislature could fix the 'released and kill again' issue without resorting to capital punishment.

As for prisons, solitary is an option, however one could argue that it's even more inhumane then capital punishment.


That doesn't preclude a change in the law at some future point. Or some sort of massive amnesty that we see sometimes in times of political upheaval. The death penalty is society decisively deciding that this person must never be allowed to kill or harm anyone else again.

The prison one is one that never gets enough focus, mainly because we have an attitude of writing off people that go to jail and that whatever happens to them there a rough form of justice. But then it's not really great to have people sentenced to life in prison without a chance of parole now performing this kind of "justice" to other people that might have a chance to reform and go back into society.

Just as a single example, Freddy Geas was a mafia hitman who was sentenced to life in prison. He killed Whitey Bulger, another murderer. Sure, Whitey wasn't innocent, but did he deserve to be beat to death by another murderer under state care?


In the case of truly heinous crimes it might help provide closure for the surviving victims and their family and friends.


Related submissions:

- Texas man sent to death row over junk science denied US Supreme Court appeal https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37748408

- A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37650402




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: