> the intent [of DCMS' letter] is quite plain for all to see […] as evidenced by youtube's response
I'm trying to parse this: what do you mean by "YouTube's response"? Their decision to de-monetize Brand (which came before the letter and is entirely independent of it)? Or their response to the letter we're discussing (which they were not sent, and do not appear to have responded to?)?
I'm trying to parse this: what do you mean by "YouTube's response"? Their decision to de-monetize Brand (which came before the letter and is entirely independent of it)? Or their response to the letter we're discussing (which they were not sent, and do not appear to have responded to?)?