Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The basic thrust of your argument is equivalent to "Google shut down a product we were paying for at the end of a normal billing cycle, so how could you be mad?" Fair enough, but acknowledging Google will honor basic contractual requirements before shutting a service down doesn't really mitigate the argument that "Google might unceremoniously kill a paid product with minimal warning." Props to Google for not committing actual fraud, for whatever that's worth.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: