Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The "nothing" probably refers to royalties which is true for architectural licensees like Apple. They instead pay for that license which is not sold per-CPU.



It was very clear that they meant nothing at all.

> Apple pays nothing, because they do not license ARM cores in any way, instead having a full royalty-free license for ARM ISA (and afaik covering updates too) since before ARM got big.


I will admit to being a bit hyperbolic there. Compared to normal ARM licensing, it's way less.

Meanwhile I recall start of RISC-V hype being, among other things, Western Digital dropping a ton of investment money into it just to escape ARM license costs.


We all get a bit hyperbolic at times! Yes, I'm sure it's a lot less than most customers pay.

I remember the WD announcement. They have open sourced the cores now I think. If you're shipping millions of drives those fees will add up.





Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: