Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Lol, you're trying to mansplain pockets.

Literally every time this has come up in conversation I've heard women complain that there aren't any options.




You don't understand, they want to both eat their cake and keep it. They want large pockets, but they also refuse to wear clothes they find ugly, and they find large pockets ugly, hence they wont find any clothes with large pockets since they filter them out before even considering it.

But of course if you ask them if they magically want larger pockets they say yes. I'd also want magical pants.


> Literally every time this has come up in conversation I've heard women complain that there aren't any options.

I've looked nowhere and I can't find it!

Literally every few years some company comes out claiming they'll make woman's pants with pockets.



[Citation needed]

I bought a phone without a 3.5mm jack once because I didn't think to check. I may have to buy one again when my Pixel dies due to lack of options.

Clearly I don't care about 3.5mm jacks /s


> [Citation needed]

Sure, try to buy anything from Pairess (2019) [1]. It turns out functional woman's clothes isn't a good enough business to last 4 years.

[1]: https://www.affirm.com/business/blog/affirm-pairess-disrupt-...


Advanced electronics have a very high barrier to entry, and are unsuitable as an analogy to the clothing business.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: