On: Woman's Pockets Are Inferior

[nottorp]

"Heads up, you’re about to experience some scroll-driven animations. If you’d like to skip that, you can jump ahead to the final state."

Oh thanks. It would have been even better if you hadn't done the scroll driven animations at all.

[chalsprhebaodu → nottorp]

Really? Clearly some people enjoy scroll driven animations as a stylistic choice and you’re given a warning and a chance to opt out and you still complain?

[nottorp → chalsprhebaodu]

Which people? Give me one pre existing quote of someone who claims to enjoy useless animations in their info and is not a designer.

Edit: emphasis on pre existing thank you. Not replies to my comment after the fact :)

[ipython → nottorp]

I enjoyed the animations. I’m not a designer.

[chalsprhebaodu → nottorp]

Ah, so the opinions of my wife and my mother who don’t blog or comment on hacker news about animations don’t count?

Also, self-selection/non response bias. Why would people who like them but otherwise don’t feel strong about them ever comment about it?

[nerdponx → nottorp]

I enjoyed the animations, but I didn't find them useless. You're correct that I don't enjoy useless animations, but this is not a useless animation.

[dagw → nottorp]

While not always a fan, I though this particular example was well done.

[festive-minsky → nottorp]

I like them..

[master-lincoln → chalsprhebaodu]

It's not clear that some people enjoy scroll driven animations. Why is it to you? Why not voice if you dislike something even if you can opt out with extra clicks?