Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think it'd be kind of neat in a backward way if we went back to the 'specialized encyclopedia' days of the 90s.

Web directories , 'Who's Who in Engineering' type lists, etc.

It's a step back from universal search engines being able to find stuff, but it's a step forward with regards to curation and quality of results; so i'm not sure if it's entirely a downgrade.

The early 90s 'website phonebook' type encyclopedias were interesting[0], but I always had to remind my mom "No, this isn't the entire internet, it's just a bunch of places that people like; the secret ones are 'unlisted'."

Note: I never say this is better than a search engine, it's just an interesting end-result after search engines got polluted and modified til the point of uselessness that we're at now with Google.

[0]: https://www.amazon.com/Internet-Directory-Guide-Usenet-Bitne...




It's already kind of like that for me, in that almost all of my searches fall into these categories:

- Wikipedia

- Online documentation for whatever language/framework/tool I'm using

- Stack Overflow / Stack Exchange for most technical questions

- Reddit if SO/SE doesn't work, and for opinionated questions (e.g. r/BuyItForLife)

- Hacker news for software recommendations and technical opinionated questions

- Arxiv or the ACM library if it's a research paper (99% of the time, whenever I google something niche the only relevant results are papers)

- Other sites like caniuse.com, university sites for health and nutritional info, old-style forums for specific software

For these searches I'm just using Google to bring me to the specific site I want, because it's faster than using the site's own search functionality. Then there are the times I literally just type in the website instead of the URL bar (e.g. "instacart"), or when I use Google maps, images, or reviews.

I'm always wary when Google returns an unfamiliar site because I'm skeptical of the results. ~70% of the time it's some blogspam which is at best accurate but overly wordy, and at worst inaccurate; sometimes it's a blog from some random individual who for whatever reason went into a deep dive trying to understand what I'm searching for, that actually turns out to be useful; the rest, idk.


Sites like Reddit are kind of like web directories with its user base collectively being the curator but it can be gamed too.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: