Nothing exaggerated, your comment implied scale was your justification: in which case there'd better have been some crazy high load that just brought the tool you already had to its knees to justify paying an additional closed source platform and manually having to pipe data to it in addition to your main data store.
Of course if I sounded incredulous it's because I didn't think you had that scale, and it sounds like I was correct?
No, you're not correct. We have over $2M ARR and with the amount of data we are storing it would be downright stupid to use Supabase.
We don't also "pipe" our data to Supabase, we use a couple different data stores depending on the best use case. For example we also use R2 and Durable Objects.
Just because you have a hammer doesn't mean everything is a nail.
Well maybe we have different definitions of scale: I think my team spends about $2M a month on compute, so we don't pride ourselves on randomly pulling in new vendors.
Of course if I sounded incredulous it's because I didn't think you had that scale, and it sounds like I was correct?