I think you have something backwards in your logic gates, you do not get to decide if your argument is weak or strong
I am now sure you're holding it wrong, you're trying to make an analogy that does not work.
In the first case, an opinion is made about the quality of LLM output. Here, you are stating a mathematical fact two ways. There is nothing to debate about 2+2 being 4
My reply about vomit applies to you then too, showing bias always weakens your argument