>We have gotten it, but with services not websites.
Misinformation.
Under all previously proposed NN rules, throttling is always allowed for network congestion and mobile actually does have a legitimate network congestion issue.
I personally would rather T-Mobile make a promise about the speeds for the first 25GB rather than say "UNLIMITED*" and make that asterisk any time they feel like it.
Likewise, they could always make allow-lists in throttling, they just couldn't make block-lists.
Nothing in your example would be better under NN rules as actually defined.
You didn't address anything after the first two sentences.
> Streaming Spotify and Apple Music won't count against that soft data cap. Streaming other music services will count against it. Video streaming over YouTube, Netflix, etc is capped at 480p levels. If you pay an additional monthly fee, you get upgraded to "Unlimited Plus" which will increase your soft cap to 40GB a month and your video streaming quality to 1080p. It'll also bundle in Netflix's basic level and give you 6 months of Apple+ for "free".
What they are saying is, even in times of low/no congestion, select services are not being counted against a consumer's data cap.
There's a difference between throttling with the network is at capacity, and throttling youtube at 480p because you offer a different service. Or just simply throttling video.
Misinformation.
Under all previously proposed NN rules, throttling is always allowed for network congestion and mobile actually does have a legitimate network congestion issue.
I personally would rather T-Mobile make a promise about the speeds for the first 25GB rather than say "UNLIMITED*" and make that asterisk any time they feel like it.
Likewise, they could always make allow-lists in throttling, they just couldn't make block-lists.
Nothing in your example would be better under NN rules as actually defined.