Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The owners have the right to do sell the bikes and collect the cash. They can spend it for anything they wish - to start a new venture, to enjoy life, to light it on fire, whatever. That's the deal they entered into when they chose to become the owners of this collection.

It's no different than if an individual sold a house or a baseball card. They can spend the cash however they like.



It’s a 501(c)(3) which doesn’t allow the board to spend the proceeds as they wish.

Not an expert here, but from what I’ve read it seems anything left over must go towards charitable purposes.


In theory, the funds should go to a nonprofit with a similar mission.

I’m confused at the auction, unless no other museums of motorcycles wanted part of the collection.


In the United States, burning banknotes is prohibited under 18 U.S.C. § 333: Mutilation of national bank obligations.


While true, I don't think anyone has ever been prosecuted under this statute for performative burnings. From what I could find prosecutions seem to be concentrated on fraud.


The internet always struggles with this concept.


Yes, the internet always struggles when registered nonprofits with what must be millions in assets “go under” in ways where it is unclear what is happening to the assets.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: