Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Indeed. And that's good.



It's good that consumers have much less power in context of forcing manufacturers to the described choice?


What do you mean by less power? It's different.

One manufacturer can't force you to buy stuff you don't want, nor ban you from buying from a different manufacturer that does what you want.

(In contrast with the FCC, which has a lot of power over you, by banning you from buying what you want.)


What if no or very few manufacturers produce a thing, yet the thing would be very beneficial to many owners?

Why would one want specifically to buy a product not conforming to the choice described in the first-level comment?


> What if no or very few manufacturers produce a thing, yet the thing would be very beneficial to many owners?

If it's useful enough, and the existing manufacturers leave significant customer needs unfilled, competing suppliers can step in.

> Why would one want specifically to buy a product not conforming to the choice described in the first-level comment?

All kinds of reasons. It might be cheaper, for example.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: