Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

AI taking to AI to do things is not necessarily an exercise in futility.

This paper used 3.5, not even 4 and is basically a couple AI agents collaborating to create software.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924

This is another example at multi AI agent collaboration.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02485

Getting relevant intelligent text to arbitrary previous text means generating text capable of making decisions. That is the end game here. Your machine can think for you now.



That's a good point. Still, I think that's different from an AI agent attending a meeting "for you" as a surrogate. If I were in a meeting where someone sent their personal AI assistant instead of attending, I would be insulted. I'd much rather someone send me a note explaining why they can't be there and letting me know anything they want from those of us in the meeting.


Well if I have it correctly right now for duet, the personal AI assistant act is only on the receiving end of the person missing the meeting. You can talk to the AI about the meeting but the AI won't talk to the attendees (only share generated notes)


This reminds me of the book priced at $23,698,655.93 (plus $3.99 shipping) by algorithms.

https://www.wired.com/2011/04/amazon-flies-24-million/




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: