Then I am happy to use your word if that clarifies things.
Just replace everything that I said about "human input" with "human authorship".
And my point is that there are many things that a human can do using AI art that have large amounts of "human authorship" beyond just the boring case of prompting midjourney with a dumb prompt.
> It depends on the level of human authorship.
Oh hey! Yes that is exactly my point.
That point being that just like Photoshop images are copyrightable, because there is human authorship, so can AI art, if there is human authorship.
Glad you agree.
> thats directed by a human closely
Ok! You agree with me then! That's my point!
My point is that AI art can be directed by a human closely and that there is so much more than can be done than a simple prompt into mid journey.
You agree with my central point.
> If you remove large parts of the image with the ai erase fill, then you've given up authorship
Not if you "direct it closely"! Then it's protected.
> how much authorship is the human having
That's is exactly what I am talking about though, that I have said multiple times.
That there are lots of things that a human can do, related to AI art that are directed closely, and that these things are authorship.
But I am glad that you agree with me that if it is directed closely then it is protected, which was my point and that you can do this with AI.
Its clear from this post that you aren't at all here in good faith, just to be glib and purposely misconstrue other people's words. good luck with life.
Then I am happy to use your word if that clarifies things.
Just replace everything that I said about "human input" with "human authorship".
And my point is that there are many things that a human can do using AI art that have large amounts of "human authorship" beyond just the boring case of prompting midjourney with a dumb prompt.
> It depends on the level of human authorship.
Oh hey! Yes that is exactly my point.
That point being that just like Photoshop images are copyrightable, because there is human authorship, so can AI art, if there is human authorship.
Glad you agree.
> thats directed by a human closely
Ok! You agree with me then! That's my point!
My point is that AI art can be directed by a human closely and that there is so much more than can be done than a simple prompt into mid journey.
You agree with my central point.
> If you remove large parts of the image with the ai erase fill, then you've given up authorship
Not if you "direct it closely"! Then it's protected.
> how much authorship is the human having
That's is exactly what I am talking about though, that I have said multiple times.
That there are lots of things that a human can do, related to AI art that are directed closely, and that these things are authorship.
But I am glad that you agree with me that if it is directed closely then it is protected, which was my point and that you can do this with AI.