> There's nothing confidential about which systems were active. The driver knows this, assuming they're not dead. You don't get to claim something is confidential if it's information that's already out there.
Therein lies another problem.
Tesla will happily (and without your specific agreement) release any and all telemetry, or use it against you, if they feel it will protect their reputation.
One of the earlier fatal FSD-related crashes, Tesla held a press conference to defend FSD. They talked about "requiring driver attention" and that, in this case, "the vehicle had issued a warning to the driver about their inattentiveness".
What they didn't say in that press conference, and was only revealed much later, though they obviously knew it at that time, was that while the vehicle had triggered an inattention warning:
1) It happened only one time, and
2) It happened eighteen MINUTES before the collision.
Therein lies another problem.
Tesla will happily (and without your specific agreement) release any and all telemetry, or use it against you, if they feel it will protect their reputation.
One of the earlier fatal FSD-related crashes, Tesla held a press conference to defend FSD. They talked about "requiring driver attention" and that, in this case, "the vehicle had issued a warning to the driver about their inattentiveness".
What they didn't say in that press conference, and was only revealed much later, though they obviously knew it at that time, was that while the vehicle had triggered an inattention warning:
1) It happened only one time, and
2) It happened eighteen MINUTES before the collision.