Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> In contrast, Tesla redacts all narrative and does not confirm injury severity. In over 700 cases, around 95% of their reports, they choose not to investigate whether an injury or fatality occurred.

Tesla has now "decided" that if active restraints or airbags are not deployed, that incident "does not count going forward".

As an automobile manufacturer, there is no good conscience reasoning that Tesla is unaware that active restraint and airbag systems of today are far more nuanced and weigh multiple criteria when deciding to deploy (as compared to initial/early implementations, which were essentially "if collision=true and speed >= X mph then deploy"). You can have a very significant incident (two that I've witnessed recently as a paramedic involved vehicles into stationary objects at ~30mph) without airbag deployment. But if that was a Tesla in FSD that hit something at 30mph and didn't deploy airbags, well, that's not an accident according to Tesla.

That also doesn't account for "incident was so catastrophic that restraint systems could not deploy", also "not counted" by Tesla. Or just as egregious, "systems failed to deploy for any reason up to and including poor assembly line quality control", also not an accident and also "not counted".




As far as I can tell that has always been their reporting methodology. As can be seen in Column CV, SV (subject vehicle) Any Airbags Deployed?, around 90% of all reports have Tesla airbag deployment. I have not been able to find reliable information on airbag deployment rate in crashes, but it is nowhere near 90%, so the report distribution is statistically unlikely if that was not already their reporting methodology.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: