You are right. I haven't read the article and just assumed. It's actually about ...

		zigzag312 on Aug 15, 2023 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Backward Compatibility, Go 1.21, and Go 2 You are right. I haven't read the article and just assumed. It's actually about how they enabled introducing "breaking" changes without actually breaking backwards compatibility with existing code. Which is best possible outcome.