Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Well, it's nice to see that I'm not completely crazy ;). I'm happy to see, however, that the article pretty much sums up why this isn't actually a feasible solution.

In addition to the extreme bulkiness of both the emitter and detectors (See Super Kamiokande), neutrinos only really get generated in certain particle decays. This means you're pretty much stuck with needing a nuclear reactor (of varying sizes) to generate them. Although this alone isn't necessarily a problem, it's really not something governments are going to be overly happy with garage hackers doing. :(

Can the detectors be sized down? Maybe. Unfortunately, there's a good chunk of inherent randomness in neutrino particle detection. It may be that there's no good way to actually detect them short of brute force: Big detectors, lots of neutrinos, and just playing the odds.

We can dream though. And investigate.




"it's really not something governments are going to be overly happy with garage hackers doing"

Fusion reactions aren't that difficult to create: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusor

Of course controlled fusion reactions that generate more energy than you put in are slightly more difficult.


I didn't say that they were difficult, I said that governments (or at least your neighbors) aren't big fan of neutron emitting sources. ;)

I'm also not saying those concerns are justified, Nuclear Theatre and all that.


I think future materials might make better detectors. Or perhaps a way to increase sensitivity?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: