Are they really the same though? I mean we are talking about room temperature, not the"(relatively) high temperature", a term that is arguably misleading to a layperson.
I'd imagine most people who are informed of the difference would recognize that cuprate SC is nowhere near as useful.
Every article older than a couple weeks talking about superconductors goes on and on about how useful they are, except for the logistics of keeping them cold
Superconductors suporting high current are incredibly useful, but that's a big caveat. There's a reason MRI scans still use the super tedious helium-cooling instead of a much simpler nitrogen cooking allowed by cuprates: the cuprates SC aren't good enough for MRI.
I'd imagine most people who are informed of the difference would recognize that cuprate SC is nowhere near as useful.