On: Man found guilty of child porn because he ran a To...

[P_I_Staker]

You here means anyone watching it, but interesting to see you get so defensive. The idea that you think "watching CP != abuse" is suspicious to begin with.

I wasn't, but it would be reasonable to accuse you of being a pedophile based on this.

[hakavlad → P_I_Staker]

>accuse you of being a pedophile based on this

Please read the diagnostic criteria: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int... -- there is no mention of CP.

[hakavlad → P_I_Staker]

JFYI: Pedophile != Child abuser.

[P_I_Staker → hakavlad]

If they have pictures on their PCs they are. It's weird that you're arguing with this.

[hakavlad → P_I_Staker]

>If they have pictures on their PCs they are.

If I have porn with men on my computer, it does not mean that I am gay or have raped men. Your reasoning is absurd.

[P_I_Staker → hakavlad]

Uh... it probably means your pretty gay, dude. Which is great, it's who you are!

... so what are you in the other scenario?