Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This feels like something that would, at large scale, be unhealthy for science as a whole. While existing papers have already gone through their own quality checks, this enables bad, misleading, or false statements to propagate which can end up being a blow to the credibility of the entire model. Shouldn't there be an ethical duty to due one's due diligence?



To be honest, this is probably one of the less unhealthy common behaviours in academia :^)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: