Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

BACPACs are the only option to get a database out of Azure SQL. And yes, they do suck, for the reasons you outlined.

For the initial migration to PaaS, whether Azure or AWS RDS, it’s faster and easier to use replication instead of BACPACs.

For moves within the Azure SQL environment, they have database copy functionality that can be utilized. (Which RDS doesn’t have, and I would have sorely missed if we hadn’t pulled the plug on AWA.)




There's a better way to get data out of Azure if you can handle a bit of manual scripting (way worth if for large tables).

Setup linked-servers from your local server (via Server Objects / Linked servers), once you've done that you can just do "INSERT INTO bigtable(..) SELECT .. FROM [remotename].dbo.bigtable;" , it'll tax the transaction log but it's a magnitude faster than bacpac's,etc. Sadly Azure SQL doesn't support linked servers so one of the servers has to be outside.


Replication is a breaking schema change, and incompatible with a long list of features and applications.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: