Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

And the infrastructure to support these "remote" homes is paid for by whom?

Also, if we don't do as you want and instead build high density only and start demolishing the sprawling suburbs then we can have forests a 5 minute walk from everyone... Parks everywhere, nature thriving, while we have to only travel 4 blocks to do everything we need to in life because the density means that Walmart and everything else can and will be in close proximity to Everyone all without the need for a personal vehicle.

See, your demand has serious knock on effects you either didn't consider or view as irrelevant against your personal privileges....



Wow, I’m sure glad you are not in charge of making decisions for how all of humanity should live their lives.


My common saying to all is:

"May you live in the world as you would have it, so long as you live as the least advantaged."

To me it's a blessing. To the majority it's a curse. In both cases it's a manifestation of our underlying natures and preferences.

What is it to you?


Why not allow everyone to live in a single family home?


Seriously?

I'm not playing your game.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: