The cars in question have 360-degree camera coverage. Use facial recognition and sue these clowns. In a civil court, where they have to pay for their own attorneys.
> This aligns with their statement that "all cars are bad" regardless of who is (or isn't) behind the wheel. So take what they say with a grain of salt.
I absolutely hate and dislike bike lanes. They are nothing but urban sabotage.
Should I be able to put up concrete blocks in bike lanes because I dislike them?
I have not studied ALL cities in the US, but in Seattle, SF, and Portland new bike lanes in more than 90% of cases carry _less_ traffic than the car lane that they had replaced. For the rest 10% there isn't enough data.
> The cars in question have 360-degree camera coverage. Use facial recognition and sue these clowns. In a civil court, where they have to pay for their own attorneys.
People in the video are covering their faces. Also, one of their complaints is non-consentual surveiller of the public, using face recognition to harass them would be playing into their hands.
Well, they'll be easy to track down with street cams and cell phone data.
And since they care about "surveillance", they are likely to be rich bike bros, so they can be profitably sued. Heck, probably just look at Reddit posts in "/r/fuckcars" and subpoena Reddit for the IPs.
> This aligns with their statement that "all cars are bad" regardless of who is (or isn't) behind the wheel. So take what they say with a grain of salt.
I absolutely hate and dislike bike lanes. They are nothing but urban sabotage.
Should I be able to put up concrete blocks in bike lanes because I dislike them?