Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

People are touting S3, but you pay twice -- storage and transfer. Using the most inexpensive options with S3, a 1 gigabyte file (with reduced redundancy) with 1 download per month would run you $0.21.

Even without the one download this would still cost you $0.093 just to keep the file!

Let's ramp up and assume you have 1TB of storage and 250GB / month of transfer. How much is that?

STORAGE: 1000 GB x $0.093 = $93.00 TRANSFER: 1000 GB x $0.120 = $120.00

TOTAL: $213.00

I should note the above does not include any servers which will actually run the websites.

Lets compare this to hosting your own (ie - dedicated):

I have a 1.5 TB RAID-I server with 1.8 TB transfer per month on a 100MB port on a month-to-month contract.

STORAGE: 1.5TB RAID-I TRANSFER: 1.8TB

Total : $123.00 / month

It is a 8-core xeon with 4GB RAM -- I run a LAPP stack with 6 Cores dedicated to ffmpeg and image conversions. Waayyyy faster than cloud.

This is more of a hosting and infrastructure question. I recommend bringing this question to the community at webhostingtalk.com.

Yes, you will have to grow into these numbers, but that can happen pretty quickly.



Just curious, who are you hosting it with?


currently at 800hosting.com. I got a slightly better deal because of an error in their order system (now fixed). It's only been a month but not problems so far.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: