Thanks for the candid answers -- sounds like this hit HN a bit earlier than you would've planned, which I realize can create a weird awkward tension between planned goals and current state and HNers' expectations.
I think it's cool that you're trying to tackle adding simplicity to managing a multi-user (if not actually multi-tenant, given the lack of row-level permissions management) SQL DB. My suggestion then would be to refine your pitch so that it matches your project a bit better -- that way you avoid the problem of people disappointed to find it doesn't do something they expected (but which it was never trying to do).
I think it's cool that you're trying to tackle adding simplicity to managing a multi-user (if not actually multi-tenant, given the lack of row-level permissions management) SQL DB. My suggestion then would be to refine your pitch so that it matches your project a bit better -- that way you avoid the problem of people disappointed to find it doesn't do something they expected (but which it was never trying to do).