Looks like a big gaping hole of ambiguity to me. A vague attempt at license compatibility. You don't get to impose terms on code under another license, and WTF does "the requirements of this license are fulfilled" without saying the result must be covered by this license? It's nonsense. There is no room here for "you know what I mean" because at best I think I know what they wish could be, but even if I'm right the details are absent.
