Interesting to see. The article posted is a poor summary with a final link to the original.
The original has more description of the study - as they call it. However, they do not describe what the prompts were or even show examples of the human vs ai pitch. They simply state the number of participants and the final result.
The original has more description of the study - as they call it. However, they do not describe what the prompts were or even show examples of the human vs ai pitch. They simply state the number of participants and the final result.
Would have loved to see examples.