Wait a second..
The 9th amendment to Constitution already states that "certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people" It is not the governments role to "set aside" rights that already belong to the people.There was a very specific set of reasons why the original Bill of Rights came to be and I could go into a long complicated post about this however for the A.D.D and TLDR crowd I'll just shorten it to this.
You already have the rights, the government does not need to "bless them"
These rights have nothing to do with the U.S. Bill of Rights. For one thing, it concerns consumers' relationships with businesses, not citizens' relationships with government.
I understand that, however it's not the Governments place to establish "rights". Regulations Yes! it is in their power to regulate But "rights" are something much more they are not established by the government only recognized by it.
...but which are unfortunately not clearly enumerated, and so subject to ongoing (and some would say endless) debate. One can't simply rely on having any given right in the absence of a prohibition to the contrary, but rather one needs to go through the process of asserting it judicially.
I'm perplexed by the downvoting, given the obvious fact that courts evaluate rights-based arguments all the time. The proper scope of the judicial power is about the biggest ongoing argument within the legal establishment, it seems to me - unless you can point me at some agreed-upon list of rights retained by the people that I don't know about.
You already have the rights, the government does not need to "bless them"