> Phones sell because they made computers unintrusive
Respectfully, how does this make any sense? Didn't mobile phones end up becoming the most intrusive technology on Earth? (I'm not sure what you specifically mean by "intrusive", but I'm assuming that you mean "the extent to which the object interrupts your life/tasks/etc.").
Phones sell because they are:
1. Convenient
2. In most civilizations on Earth, it became a necessary item in order to live (authentication, payments, maps, etc.).
I'll skip the lesser points, such as the fact that they took over the camera for >99% of people for 99% of the time.
> Didn't mobile phones end up becoming the most intrusive
I mean intrusive in blocking yoru attention and isolating you from the environment and blocking sensory input. While it grabs your attention it doesnt isolate . Phones are attention-grabbing but nowhere near as intrusive as goggles
I would say it’s a comfort/accessibility issue. Smart phones are just easier to use. Not from an efficiency perspective. There’s just less physical resistance.
Respectfully, how does this make any sense? Didn't mobile phones end up becoming the most intrusive technology on Earth? (I'm not sure what you specifically mean by "intrusive", but I'm assuming that you mean "the extent to which the object interrupts your life/tasks/etc.").
Phones sell because they are:
1. Convenient
2. In most civilizations on Earth, it became a necessary item in order to live (authentication, payments, maps, etc.).
I'll skip the lesser points, such as the fact that they took over the camera for >99% of people for 99% of the time.