This is mad. Only BEVs can be refueled at home, and that is the absolute killer feature. People are obsessed with public chargers but most EV drivers never use them, or at least, only very rarely, on unusually long trips.
I can't put more hydrogen, or gasoline, into a vehicle without getting it from somewhere else.
> I can't put more hydrogen, or gasoline, into a vehicle without getting it from somewhere else.
Gasoline is not too hard to transport. I have two 20L gas gans at home that I generally keep full. For gas powered lawn things, and a portable genrator, but also for when I want to charge my cars at home.
That is wrong. You can make hydrogen at home. You only need water and electricity. People are simply imagining advantages of BEVs.
That said, there is not much need for home hydrogen production. It is better to have a more centralized refueling system. It is why gas stations replaces gas can deliveries.
You can make hydrogen at home, what you cannot do is compress it and put it into your car without tens off thousands of dollars worth of equipment. Oh and if anything goes wrong it's an explosion hazard.
Wrong again. With modern advancements, you can conceive of electromagnetic system that can do this at low cost and with no complex mechanisms. This is just another anti-hydrogen propaganda argument, and is based on willful ignorance of what is technologically possible.
The fundamental issue isn't technology, but lack of need; Home refueling is just unnecessary once you have refueling stations everywhere.
Have you seen your own comment history? Boy, I had no idea that hydrogen propaganda was a thing.
I know you wouldn't admit it if you were but I wonder if anyone gets paid for doing this. I know the oil industry has been dumping enormous amount of money into trying to paint BEVs as Bad and Wrong, but it's another thing to see someone put so much time into it.
You are the same type of person who goes around and asks why pro-nuclear people are so unwilling to change their minds. The answer is simple: They are not unwilling change to their minds. The problem is that their opponents are simply wrong. There is nothing change their minds about. Their opponents are the ones that are ones that are unwilling to change their minds.
This is the same thing. There isn't even a debate anymore. If there is any desire to reach zero emissions, than vast amounts of resources need to be invested in hydrogen. It is completely unavoidable and non-negotiable. No one, not even Tesla, believes that we can avoiding investing billions into green hydrogen production. Even BEVs require hydrogen as a form of energy storage before they can reach zero emissions, making them nearly redundant as ideas. Nevermind the vast need for hydrogen in industry.
Long story short, you are simply brainwashed by outdated BEV propaganda. You are basically spreading a conspiracy theory, and are profoundly ignorant of the entire problem. What I am doing is simply pushing back against that ignorance. In reality, hydrogen is fundamental to green energy, and batteries are not. BEV fanatics fundamental need to wake and stop believing in delusion. Hydrogen is almost certain the future of transportation, and BEV are almost certainly a transitional idea. If anything, BEV fanatics are trapped in a mid-2000s idea, and have failed to move on. It is an idea already obsolete, and they are doing more to block climate change solutions than anything else.
I can't put more hydrogen, or gasoline, into a vehicle without getting it from somewhere else.