Which parts are biased? Things like whether or not the government allowed the domain owner to contest the extensions should be pretty easy to verify. I'm sure that the lawyer probably has some record of a number of the communications he/she had with the government.
I realize that there's a bit of hand-waving with respect to 'holding people responsible,' but most of the things in that article that are verifiable are pretty damning of the government if they are true.
I realize that there's a bit of hand-waving with respect to 'holding people responsible,' but most of the things in that article that are verifiable are pretty damning of the government if they are true.