Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not going to be extorted lol. If you're showing me something I have a right to ignore the parts I don't care about, and I have a right to have a computer do the ignoring for me so I don't waste my time/mental effort.


You're not being extorted, you have no right to access to YouTube's content unconditionally.


Youtube has a monopoly on online video content. It is extortion

Before they had the total monopoly, they had very few ads. Now they have the monopoly, so they are extorting us because of it


Oh man, let me help you find other content platforms! What are you interested in?!

I use these non cable/network platforms:

* https://dropout.tv <- comedy produced shows, hilarious

* https://curiositystream.com/ <- full to the brim with documentaries and educational content

* https://www.pbs.org/explore/ <- it's PBS, but online!

* https://www.britbox.com/us/ <- British TV shows! So many good ones...

And then there are the obvious platforms that aren't YT:

* HBO Max

* Peacock

* Netflix

* Paramount+

* Hulu

* Amazon Prime Video

* Apple TV+

So no, I don't really agree that YouTube has a monopoly. Too many alternatives that kick ass!


Just a passerby, but content isn't fungible; no one is replacing Technology Connections with House of the Dragon or vice versa. The diversity of YouTube's content, the back catalog, its default status, network effects, integration with devices and services, and so much more make it hard to replace.

And we shouldn't forget, rando users can upload whatever for sharing, which none of your alternatives do. Kind of the core idea there.


I love Technology Connections FWIW, completely changed how I use my dishwasher!

And I would disagree re: content isn't fungible. Nothing on YouTube is both necessary to specifically consume and entirely unavailable elsewhere. It's entertainment, and whatever "category" of entertainment you prefer, you can find content not on YouTube for that thing.

"Random users uploading content" has not been the primary use case of YouTube for many years now. It's mostly run by content creators now, with entire companies dedicated to creating content, just the same as the platforms I've listed.


Extremely obvious case of apples not being oranges, in the sense of user-generated content not being the same as studio/production company generated content.


> So no, I don't really agree that YouTube has a monopoly. Too many alternatives that kick ass!

None of those are YouTube alternatives. They are not even remotely similar. You haven't got a clue what YouTube is about.

Here's a list of YouTube alternatives:

* Rumble

* Odysee

* Vimeo

* Twitch

* BitChute

But the alternatives are niche platforms with nowhere near the level of content that YouTube provides.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: