(1) the truncated axes hide what a small effect size it seems to be and (2) even though they state the p-value is significant, eyeballing it there seems to be a really wide variance that is almost overlpaping b/w the two situations.
It seems to me like a marginally significant result with a very small effect size.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36521010/#&gid=article-figur...
(1) the truncated axes hide what a small effect size it seems to be and (2) even though they state the p-value is significant, eyeballing it there seems to be a really wide variance that is almost overlpaping b/w the two situations.
It seems to me like a marginally significant result with a very small effect size.