That is actually the killer feature of interactive AIs.
People go on and on and on about "accuracy", completely ignoring that accuracy is irrelevant to 99.9% of things that humans do in their everyday lives.
Simulating (positive) human interaction is far more impactful than getting facts correct.
> Simulating (positive) human interaction is far more impactful than getting facts correct.
In my experience, people with the attitude that AI will give them a more fulfilling relationship than humans will aren't exactly friendly to begin with.
If you don't already know the answer to that question, I doubt it would be possible to explain it to you. Looking for precise definitions of essential human qualities is a fool's errand.
People go on and on and on about "accuracy", completely ignoring that accuracy is irrelevant to 99.9% of things that humans do in their everyday lives.
Simulating (positive) human interaction is far more impactful than getting facts correct.