Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Massive paper, but a quick scroll to several random statistical tables shows a very clear and indisputable gender preference in hiring.



Yup.

Headline: "Research Finds No Gender Bias in Academic Science"

Subheading: "women have an edge over men in hiring."

Paper abstract: "[women] are advantaged over men in a fourth domain (hiring), For teaching ratings and salaries, we found evidence of bias against women; although gender gaps in salary were much smaller than often claimed, they were nevertheless concerning."

Paper contents:

- "Lutter and Schröder (2016) found that women needed 23% to 44% fewer publications than men to obtain a tenured job in German sociology departments"

- "in the authors’ main experiment (N = 363), faculty expressed a significant preference for hiring women. This pro-female preference was similar across fields, types of institution, and gender and rank of faculty"

- "The authors found that all else being equal, faculty were between 5% and 10% more likely to favor a female candidate or a gender nonbinary candidate, respectively, over an identically accomplished male"

- "The authors found a significant pro-female advantage, with faculty rating female applicants’ competence and hirability significantly higher than identically accomplished male applicants"


That doesn't count as gender bias. Gender bias is when the system discriminates against women. When it does the same against men, it's equity.


Assumed /s but yes that seems to be the (re)definition they're using.


Are you being sarcastic, or serious?


I think it’s both.

In my field for instance, if you are a woman, you get to skip the review line for publishing case reports.

Luckily for me I don’t give a shit about case reports, but if I was academically oriented? Maybe I would.


Doesn't seem equitable to me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: