> You should practically never parallel different values of MLCC
Can you then say why paralleling capacitors to cover higher frequency range is repeated often in literature? Was it true before MLCC? Why is it not valid with MLCC?
Based on jmwilson's article above, it seems you can end up with nasty resonances. With other capacitor types that have more ESR, they dampen out the resonance peaks.
Can you then say why paralleling capacitors to cover higher frequency range is repeated often in literature? Was it true before MLCC? Why is it not valid with MLCC?